Observational studyActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
The severity of second-degree perineal tears and dyspareunia during one year postpartum: A prospective cohort study.
Observational study in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association Between Sitting Delivery During the Second Stage of Labor and Pelvic Floor Function in Primiparas: A Prospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- The severity of second-degree perineal tears and dyspareunia during one year postpartum: A prospective cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionChildbirth-related injuries of the pelvic floor may impact women's sexual health with symptoms such as dyspareunia. A better understanding of dyspareunia based on tissue trauma severity in second-degree tears is needed. The primary aim of this study was to assess differences in dyspareunia according to the severity of perineal tears, with a focus on subcategories of second-degree tears at three and twelve months postpartum. The secondary aim was to assess the time to resumption of intercourse after birth according to the severity of second-degree tears. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis single-center observational cohort study was conducted between January 2021 and July 2022. Women meeting the inclusion criteria were included during pregnancy. After birth, all perineal tears were classified according to RCOG recommendation, and second-degree tears were further subcategorized based on the percentage of damage to the perineum (2A, 2B, 2C). Dyspareunia and time to resumption of intercourse were collected through an electronic questionnaire at three and twelve months postpartum.
resultsOur study included 857 women; of them, 51.6% (n = 442) were primipara and 48.4% (n = 415) were multipara. The percentages of women reporting dyspareunia according to the degree of the tear at three months postpartum were as follows: no tear/first-degree tear 60%, 2A-tear 60%, 2B-tear 52%, 2C-tear 77%, and episiotomy 77%; and at twelve months postpartum: no tear/first-degree tear 52%, 2A-tear 50%, 2B-tear 40%, 2C-tear 69%, and episiotomy 64%. When comparing dyspareunia between the no tear/first-degree tear category and the second-degree subcategories, no statistically significant differences were found. Women in all second-degree subcategories resumed intercourse approximately 4.8 months postpartum, compared to 3.8 months postpartum for those with no tear or first-degree tear (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThere was no statistically significant association between the severity of second-degree tears and dyspareunia. The proportion of women reporting dyspareunia is noticeable for all perineal tear categories, with the highest rate among women with the most severe second-degree perineal tear. Women in all second-degree subcategories resumed intercourse approximately one month later than those with no tear or first-degree tear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.