Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012475›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2025

Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection on Early Oncological Outcomes in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients With Node-Negative PSMA PET.

Baris Esen, Hulya Seymen, Ayşe Armutlu, Ersin Koseoglu, Ibrahim Can Aykanat, Hatice Zoroğlu, Abdullah Erdem Canda, Yakup Kordan, Mevlana Derya Balbay, Dilek Ertoy Baydar and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. PSMA-Targeted radiopharmaceuticals: from diagnosis to risk & quality of life.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Baris EsenDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3117-4607
Hulya SeymenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Ayşe ArmutluDepartment of Pathology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Ersin KoseogluDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Ibrahim Can AykanatDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Hatice ZoroğluDepartment of Urology, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University Hospital, Tokat, Turkiye.
Abdullah Erdem CandaDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Yakup KordanDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Mevlana Derya BalbayDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Dilek Ertoy BaydarDepartment of Pathology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Mehmet Onur DemirkolDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
Derya TilkiDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-1380
Tarık EsenDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPSMA PET/CT has previously shown superior performance in nodal staging of prostate cancer (PCa) and may be used to reduce the number of unnecessary PLND procedures. This study aims to assess the performance of PSMA PET/CT in nodal staging of intermediate-risk prostate cancer and to evaluate the effect of PLND on oncological outcomes of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with a negative PSMA PET/CT.

methodsA total of 308 patients with intermediate-risk PCa who underwent PSMA PET/CT for nodal staging between January 2014 and July 2024 were included in the study. Patients who underwent PLND had higher PSA and higher rates of PIRADS-5 and biopsy grade-group 3 disease. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to eliminate patient characteristics differences between groups and 140 patients were included in the final analysis. PSA persistence rates ( ≥ 0.1 ng/dL) and biochemical recurrence (BCR; ≥ 0.2 ng/dL) rates after RP were recorded. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to evaluate oncological outcomes. Log-rank test was utilized to compare oncological outcomes in patients with and without PLND.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA PET/CT on nodal staging were 53.3%, 95%, 47.1%, and 96.1%, respectively. The NPV of PSMA PET/CT in patients with biopsy GG3 disease (96.3%) was similar to those with biopsy GG2 disease (95.6%). The median follow-up after propensity score matching was 20.7 months. The 24-month BCR-free survival rates were 83.7% and 86.9% in the PLND-RP group and RP-only groups, respectively (p = 0.078).

conclusionsNPV of PSMA PET/CT in determining LNI was remarkable in patients with intermediate-risk PCa and PLND was found to have no impact on oncological outcomes. Therefore PLND may be omitted to decrease surgery-related complications in patients with intermediate-risk PCa a negative PSMA PET/CT for nodal staging.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPelvisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIintermediatelymph node dissectionPETprostate cancerPSMAstaging

Identifiers

PMID40012475
PMCPMC12038081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.