Observational studyCurrent vascular pharmacology2025
Clinical Predictors of Warfarin Response Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Evidence from the Middle Eastern JoFib Study.
Observational study in Current vascular pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence, Incidence, and Impact of Cancer in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 70,000,000 Patients.Health science reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo describe clinical factors predictive of warfarin response in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients and to evaluate its association with adverse outcomes.
methodsPatients in the Middle Eastern JoFib study, a prospective, multicenter registry of AF patients, using warfarin with at least one international normalized ratio (INR) reading, were enrolled. We used the most recent INR as a measure of warfarin control.
resultsOut of the total 2020 patients, 544 (26.9%) were using warfarin. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that heart failure (adjusted OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.36-0.86) and increasing HAS-BLED score (adjusted OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.58-0.92) decreased the odds of having a therapeutic INR. Chronic kidney disease (adjusted OR 3.11, 95%CI 1.46-6.62), heart failure (adjusted OR 2.37, 95%CI 1.4-4.01), and cancer (adjusted OR 2.48, 95%CI 1.03-6.01) were independently predictive of having INR less than 2.0. The first episode of AF was independently predictive of having INR above 3.0 (adjusted OR 2.48, 95%CI 1.39-4.42). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that INR below the therapeutic range (aHR 4.36, 95%CI 2.19-8.68) and INR above the therapeutic range (aHR 3.03, 95%CI 1.33-6.92) were predictive of all-cause mortality. Below-range INR also predicted cardiovascular mortality (aHR 3.69, 95%CI 1.66-8.16).
conclusionClinical factors predictive of sub-optimal INR in Middle Eastern AF patients using warfarin include chronic kidney disease, heart failure, cancer, high HAS-BLED score, and first episode of AF. Furthermore, sub-optimal INR is predictive of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40012392What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.