ArticleCurrent hypertension reviews2025
The Dose-response of Blood Pressure Variability in Stroke and Coronary Heart Disease.
Article in Current hypertension reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Asian expert consensus on high-quality hypertension management.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction/ Objective: Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a potential predictor of vascular events and triggers target organ damage. This study aimed to determine the BPV in stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) in the Bogor Cohort Study in Indonesia.
methodsOver six years of monitoring, a prospective cohort study was conducted on 1649 respondents aged ≥ 31 years from the Bogor Non-communicable Diseases Risk Factors Cohort Study. The dependent variable was vascular events (stroke or CHD), which were new cases (incidents) that appeared during the 6-year monitoring period (2011 - 2017 and 2012-2018).
resultDuring the six years of monitoring, the incidence of vascular events was 12.4 percent. The dose-response of systolic and diastolic BPV in vascular events, stroke, and coronary heart disease showed an increased risk (quintiles Q2, Q3, and Q4) compared to quintile 1 (Q1). Systolic BPV of ≥12,10 mmHg and diastolic BPV of ≥ 7,31 mmHg had a risk of 2.3 and 1.7 (95% Confidence Intervals (CI)), respectively, for vascular events during the period of 6-year observation, after controlling for age, hypertension status, and lipid profile.
conclusionBPV is an independent predictor of vascular events, stroke, and coronary heart disease. The public and clinicians must pay attention to controlling BPV as a risk factor for vascular events, stroke, and CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40012389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.