Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012340›Full record

ArticleDyslexia (Chichester, England)2025

Investigating Reading Enjoyment in Adults With Dyslexia.

Hannah Jones, Amrita Bains, Laura Randall, Carina Spaulding, Jessie Ricketts, Saloni Krishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Providing choice enhances reading motivation.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah JonesDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Surrey, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4515-9329
Amrita BainsDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Surrey, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8824-6192
Laura RandallDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Surrey, UK.
Carina SpauldingThe Reading Agency, London, UK.
Jessie RickettsDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Surrey, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2760-3990
Saloni KrishnanDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Surrey, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6466-141X

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences SBF006\1031Economic and Social Research Council ES/P00072X/1-2429186Experimental Psychology Society Medical Research: Council MR/X003647/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that adults with dyslexia do not enjoy reading, based on data from trait-based questionnaires. This study uses state-based measures of reading to offer greater insight into different aspects of motivation, including liking and wanting. In a new paradigm sensitive to dynamic changes in reading enjoyment, adults with dyslexia (n = 59) and without dyslexia (n = 59) read 24 book extracts, rated their enjoyment and answered a question about the extract. Subsequently, participants decided whether to accept a cost (e.g., 3-6 s wait) to read the next paragraph. We also collected traditional trait-based measures of enjoyment. While neurotypical adults had higher trait-based reading enjoyment, average state-based reading enjoyment did not differ between groups. The relationship between high enjoyment states and subsequent benefits was altered in dyslexia. While heightened states of enjoyment increased the likelihood of continuing to read, this was attenuated in adults with dyslexia. In neurotypical adults, high states of enjoyment increased the likelihood of answering the question about the text correctly; this relationship did not hold in adults with dyslexia. Our findings shed light on how links between intrinsic value and subsequent motivation are altered in adults with dyslexia, suggesting that reading enjoyment can drive reading engagement but not comprehension.

Indexed as

DyslexiaMotivationPleasureReadingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultdyslexialiteracyreadingreading comprehension

Identifiers

PMID40012340
PMCPMC11865878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.