ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2025
Diagnostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in gastrointestinal cancers with ascites - A cross sectional study.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does Malignant Ascites Define Prognosis in Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Spread? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Malignant ascites is suggestive of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The distinction between malignant and non-malignant ascites in a patient with malignancy is important, as it alters the management and prognosis. Current diagnostic methods are imaging, cytology, and diagnostic laparoscopy, all of which have low sensitivities. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is essential for tumour growth and, hence, ascitic VEGF levels can be a diagnostic method for malignant ascites. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies and ascites. The calculated sample size was 68 patients, who were divided into those who were truly positive or negative for malignant ascites based on a composite gold standard, comprising cytology, contrast enhanced computed tomography, and laparoscopy. The ascitic VEGF levels in these patients were compared. Results: A total of 84 patients were enrolled, of whom 60.71% were found to have malignant ascites. It was found that the greater the volume of ascites, the greater the statistical likelihood of finding truly malignant ascites. The ascitic VEGF levels had a non-normal distribution, with median values of 783.64 and 41.12 pg/mL for malignant and non-malignant ascites (p<0.001). Using a receiver operating characteristics curve, a cut-off of 83.68 pg/mL was obtained, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93.94%. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that ascitic VEGF levels are significantly elevated in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies and malignant ascites and hence can reliably be used for diagnosing malignant ascites. This study also shows that massive ascites and well-differentiated tumours have a higher rate of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.