ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2025
A questionnaire on the perception of social and academic discrimination against female general surgeons in Türkiye.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender equity and professional experience of female colorectal surgeons in Italy: results of a National survey.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Winter is coming: Is the shine of surgery fading?Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
- The double burden: Family, career, and gender discrimination in surgery.Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this research was to identify the specific prejudices that women in general surgery in Türkiye have to face in their workplace and academic careers. This was achieved by gathering the opinions of both genders on these issues and raising awareness of gender bias to promote a more inclusive environment for future generations of surgeons. Material and Methods: A total of 202 people, 99 male and 103 female surgeons, participated in the survey. The questionnaire was distributed to people working in general surgery clinics via e-mail and WhatsApp groups of the Turkish Surgical Association and the Turkish Colorectal Association. Results: The mean age of the participants was 37.65±11.55 years (ranging from 24 to 74 years). Among the partipiciants, 40.4% agreed that surgery is more suitable for males, while 89.3% of women disagreed (p<0.001). 88.3% of the women stated that women are negatively influenced in choosing general surgery because of the male-dominated environment, and 52.5% of men agreed, while 40.4% of men disagreed (p<0.001). 66.7% of men and 65% of women believed that women do not prefer to work in general surgery because it is difficult to balance with family responsibilities (p=0.890). Women are more subjected to humiliating behaviors, while 53.4% of women agree. 85.4% of the women stated that it is important to have a female lecturer as a role model in the institution where they work. Conclusion: This study shows different views on gender prejudice among male and female surgeons in general surgery. Female respondents, including male and female surgeons, indicated experiencing bias and underrepresentation in academic disciplines, although they had differing perspectives on discrimination. Both genders agreed on the difficulty of work-life balance, with a similar percentage of individuals identifying family responsibilities as an obstacle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.