Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012279›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2025

Pathologic results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy specimens with 8148 patients in a single center.

Hikmet Pehlevan Özel, Tolga Dinç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hikmet Pehlevan ÖzelClinic of General Surgery, Mamak State Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9146-3742
Tolga DinçDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3772-7468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of incidental pathologies detected in the surgical specimens of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high-volume referral center, which accepts patients from different regions of our country, and to contribute to epidemiological studies. Material and Methods: Male and female patients over 18 years of age who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between July 2010 and May 2019 were included in the study. All surgical specimens were taken for pathologic examination. The pathology results were classified into three categories: Benign pathologies (including cholecystitis, non-neoplastic lesions and benign tumors), premalignant pathologies and malignant pathologies. Results: The study included a total of 8148 patients. The mean age was 49.74±14.51 years (minimum 18, maximum 94) and 72.2% of the patients were female. Benign pathologies included cholecystitis in 1742 (21.4%), non-neoplastic lesions in 6203 (76.1%) and benign tumors in 12 (0.1%), premalignant pathologies in 173 (2.1%) and malignant pathologies in 18 (0.2%). Although no statistically significant gender difference was observed between benign, premalignant and malignant pathologies, the incidence of premalignant and malignant pathologies increased with age (p=0.273, p<0.001, respectively). Conclusion: In this study of 8148 patients, incidental premalignant and malignant pathologies were identified in 2.1% and 0.2% of cases, respectively, which is consistent with the findings of literature. These results may be instructive for epidemiologic studies.

Indexed as

cancerdysplasiaGallbladderhistopathology

Identifiers

PMID40012279
PMCPMC11878175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.