ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Patient preferences for triple-class-exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treatment: a discrete-choice study.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Smoldering multiple myeloma: a multi-country mixed-methods study on disease perceptions and patient treatment preferences.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Immunoglobulin prophylaxis should be initiated after bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma, regardless of IgG levels.Blood advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo quantify patient preferences for attributes of novel treatments for triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
methodsUsing a discrete-choice experiment, we elicited preferences for 7 attributes: objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), all-grade cytokine release syndrome risk, all-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome risk, serious infection risk (grade 3+), treatment administration, and initial hospitalization requirements.
resultsOS was the most important attribute (conditional relative importance [CRI] 32.0% for a 24-month increase), followed by serious infection risk (CRI 17.3% for avoiding a 60% risk), initial hospitalization requirements (CRI 15.0% for avoiding 14 days of initial hospitalization), and ORR (CRI 13.7% for a 38% increase). Based on differences between relative preference weights, fewer initial hospitalization days when starting treatment and off-the-shelf (vs. chimeric antigen receptor T [CAR T] cell-like) options were significantly preferred.
conclusionsTherapy decisions for patients with TCE RRMM should consider tradeoffs between efficacy, safety, and attributes related to treatment process and initial monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.