ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2025
RETRACTION: Synthesis and Cardiovascular Protective Effects of Quercetin 7-O-Sialic Acid.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interventional Effects of Edible Bird's Nest or Sialic Acids on Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression in Mice.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionH. Tian, Q. Liu, S. Qin, C. Zong, Y. Zhang, S. Yao, N. Yang, T. Guan, and S. Guo, "Synthesis and Cardiovascular Protective Effects of Quercetin 7-O-Sialic Acid," Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 21, no. 1 (2017): 107-120, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12943. The above article, published online on 11 August 2016, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal Editor-in-Chief, Stefan N. Constantinescu, the Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, and John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Following publication, concerns were raised by third parties that Figures 3 and 5 contained duplicated images. The authors acknowledged the duplications but were unable to provide the uncropped western blot raw data. The retraction has been agreed upon because of the duplication concerns, affecting the interpretation of the data and results presented.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.