Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012211›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie2025

'COVID-19 Belongs to Everyone… in This War-We Are Alone': Israeli Therapists' Perceptions of the Pandemic and 2023 War.

Reut Ben-Kimhy, Hilit Erel-Brodsky, Orit Taubman-Ben-Ari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reut Ben-KimhyThe Gender Studies Program, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Hilit Erel-BrodskyThe Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Orit Taubman-Ben-AriThe Louis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9308-4052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic had widespread socio-psychological consequences. About 3 years later, on 7 October 2023, a horrific invasion by the Hamas terrorist organisation took place in Israel, leading to a war in Gaza. These two massive emergency events can be classified as disasters, with far-reaching implications. During both periods, mental health professionals faced shared trauma, thus experiencing the trauma both personally and through the experiences of their patients. In this study, we focus on therapists' experiences, thoughts, and feelings during these emergency events that have befallen Israel. An open-ended questionnaire was completed by 201 therapists. A thematic analysis was performed, revealing two main categories: differentiation between the events, relating to the essence of each threat as unique; and a continuum, relating to the events by drawing a linear line from the first to the second, integrating their implications into a coherent interpretation. The findings contribute to the increasing awareness of the complexity of therapists' experiences in such difficult situations, highlighting the need to pay attention to professionals' perceptions and feelings during such intense times, while also demonstrating the importance of understanding the differences between disasters and their consequences.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19Psychological TraumaPsychotherapistsAdultFemaleHumansIsraelMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID‐19mental health professionalstherapistswar

Identifiers

PMID40012211
PMCPMC11865683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.