ReviewHip & pelvis2025
Safety of Cement-augmented Femoral Cephalomedullary Nails: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Review in Hip & pelvis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Perioperative management of trochanteric femoral fractures : Fasting, fluid therapy and multimodal pain management as underappreciated factors].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- [Cement augmentation in pertrochanteric fractures : Evidence, indication and surgical application].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Comparison of mechanical and clinical outcomes between cement-augmented and conventional cephalomedullary nailing in osteoporotic trochanteric fractures: a propensity score-matched cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Cement Augmentation of the Blade in Proximal Femoral Nailing for Trochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Comparison of Mechanical Stability and Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trochanteric fractures of the femur pose an increasing burden for elderly people. The standard treatment for these types of fractures includes cephalomedullary nailing, which can be augmented with cement. Although many studies have reported on the stability of this augmented construct, few studies have examined its clinical benefit and safety. Therefore, the objective of this meta-analysis is to examine the perioperative complications and postoperative mortality associated with cement-augmented nails in the management of intertrochanteric and pertrochanteric fractures of the hip. A search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) until January 2024 was conducted. Analysis of the outcomes included perioperative complications and postoperative mortality. Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. Fewer perioperative complications were observed when using a cemented femoral nail (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.