ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Investigation of the Effectiveness of a Biopsychosocial-Based Exercise Approach in Rheumatic Diseases: A Mixed Methods Research With Patients' Perspectives.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biopsychosocial model-based exercise improves muscle strength, proprioception, pain, function, and quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis patients with knee involvement: a randomized controlled clinical tiral.Rheumatology international · 2025Trial
- Assessing biopsychosocial status in people living with HIV: validity, reliability, and responsiveness of BETY-BQ.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesTo investigate the effectiveness and acceptability, and thus practicability of a biopsychosocial-based exercise model in rheumatic diseases by a mixed method.
methodThis study is within the framework of mixed-method research that combines the strengths of quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. For the quantitative part of the study, 81 patients were divided into two groups Bilişsel Egzersiz Terapi Yaklaşımı (BETY)- (Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach in English) exercise group (BETY Group-BG) and control group (CG). BG participants engaged in supervised exercise sessions with a physiotherapist for 1 h, three times weekly, over 12-week periods, while CG participants continued only routine medical treatment. Biopsychosocial status (BETY-Biopsychosocial Questionnaire [BETY-BQ]), functionality (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]), emotional status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]), and quality-of-life (Short Form-36 [SF-36]) was evaluated at baseline and 12 weeks. Qualitative data was collected from 20 patients who have acquired the habit of regular exercise by attending the BETY group exercise programme. Individual, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were recorded, transcribed, and condensed and interpreted based on pre-established themes.
resultThere were differences in the BETY-BQ, HAQ, HADS-D, and SF-36 scores between baseline and 12 weeks in the BG (p < 0.05). Additionally, in post-intervention, the BETY-BQ, HADS-A, and SF-36 scores differences between groups were in favour of the BG (p < 0.05). In qualitative analysis, four sections were investigated, which were subdivided into 'Biopsychosocial Status', 'Functionality', 'Emotional Status' and 'Quality of Life'.
conclusionBETY is an effective and acceptable exercise model for managing the symptoms of patients with rheumatic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.