Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012063›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

Overcoming barriers to implementation of patient engagement in clinical trials: feasibility testing of an embedded study.

Geneviève Castonguay, Sylvain Bédard, Anick Dubois, Émilie Lessard, Léna Rivard, Ghislaine Rouly, Antoine Boivin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geneviève CastonguayCanada Research Chair in Partnership with Patients and Communities, Montreal University Hospital Research Center, 850 St-Denis St, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Sylvain BédardCenter of Excellence for Partnership with Patients and the Public, Montreal University Hospital Research Center, 850 St-Denis St, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Anick DuboisMontreal Heart Institute, 5000 Bélanger St, Montreal, Québec, H1T 1C8, Canada.
Émilie LessardCanada Research Chair in Partnership with Patients and Communities, Montreal University Hospital Research Center, 850 St-Denis St, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Léna RivardMontreal Heart Institute, 5000 Bélanger St, Montreal, Québec, H1T 1C8, Canada.
Ghislaine RoulyCanada Research Chair in Partnership with Patients and Communities, Montreal University Hospital Research Center, 850 St-Denis St, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Antoine BoivinCanada Research Chair in Partnership with Patients and Communities, Montreal University Hospital Research Center, 850 St-Denis St, Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada. antoine.boivin@umontreal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient engagement is attracting considerable interest as a potential strategy to improve the conduct of clinical trials, with evidence of significant improvement in research participant recruitment. However, impact on the retention and adherence of clinical trial participants requires further studies. Embedded studies are specific research designs where a secondary study is "embedded" into a larger host study. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of embedding a study of patient partnership in research, within an ongoing multi-center clinical trial on drug treatment.

methodsWe developed and embedded a patient engagement intervention (embedded study) into a phase 3 randomized clinical drug trial (host study). The patient engagement intervention consisted of discussions between host study participants and a patient partner, to improve research participants' experience and retention in the clinical trial. We carried out individual semi-structured interviews with patient partners and other research team members involved in the development and implementation of the embedded study, as well as an analysis of project documents. Data were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis.

resultsFactors impacting feasibility and lessons learned for future embedded studies on engagement science were identified. Barriers that curtailed the implementation of patient engagement into an ongoing clinical trial included: the late integration of the embedded study into the host clinical trial, different visions of patient partnership and its potential benefits, differences in communication style and preferences, a lack of fit between the specific needs of the host study and the proposed engagement model, and an overall sense of burden. Integrating patient partners into the host clinical trial was seen as potentially beneficial in improving the experience of participants in the host clinical trial through experience sharing, providing support for the consent process, and improving knowledge transfer.

conclusionsThis feasibility study offers insights into how contextual factors and decisions made during the design phase can impact the implementation of patient engagement studies embedded in a clinical trial. Findings suggest that knowledge of the clinical trial context (e.g., organizational, administrative, regulatory, ethics) and early collaboration among embedded study and host study teams before initiation of both studies are key conditions for success.

Indexed as

BarriersClinical trialEmbedded studyFeasibilityImplementationPatient EngagementPatient involvement

Identifiers

PMID40012063
PMCPMC11866851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.