ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Knowledge, attitude, and determinant factors towards emergency first-aid utilization among public transport service drivers in Injibara, northwest Ethiopia.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attitudes of emergency healthcare workers on electric vehicle accidents: a descriptive study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProviding timely first-aid by trained responders can reduce deaths and disabilities from road traffic accidents, a leading global cause of death. Ethiopia ranks 19th worldwide and 4th in Africa. Therefore, this study assesses the knowledge and, attitudes toward emergency first aid, and its factors among public transport drivers in Injibara, Ethiopia.
objectiveTo assess the Knowledge, and Attitude towards first-aid utilization and its associated factors among Public Transport Service Drivers in Injibara, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted involving 419 public transport drivers, selected systematically based on vehicle side numbers, starting with a random choice for the first respondent. Subsequent participants were chosen at every second interval (k = 2). A structured questionnaire was used to collect relevant data. Binary logistic regression was performed using SPSS V.26 to assess the associations between independent and dependent variables. The strength of these associations was measured using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, with a P-value < 0.05 deemed statistically significant.
resultThe study revealed that the prevalence of good knowledge and favorable attitudes toward first-aid utilization was 33.2% and 38.2%, respectively. Participation in first-aid training (AOR = 0.566, p = 0.027), access to a first-aid kit (AOR = 1.65, p = 0.027), and prior experience using first-aid at accident scenes (AOR = 0.476, p = 0.014) were factors associated with better first-aid utilization. Drivers who had used a first-aid kit (AOR = 0.476, p = 0.014) and those exposed to training (AOR = 0.486, p = 0.034) demonstrated more positive attitudes toward first aid.
conclusionThe knowledge and attitude toward first-aid utilization remain low. Participation in first-aid training, access to first-aid kits, and experience using them during accidents were factors associated with improved knowledge. Additionally, drivers who have used first-aid kits and received training tend to have a favorable attitude toward their use. Therefore, relevant authorities must enhance the availability of first-aid kits, increase the exposure of drivers, and provide training to drivers to increase their knowledge and favorable attitude towards first-aid utilization. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.