ArticleNursing in critical care2025
Relationship between work productivity and patient safety attitudes among intensive and critical care nurses: A structural equation modelling approach.
Article in Nursing in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of migraine on work productivity of healthcare providers at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Excessive workload as a risk factor for patient and medical staff safety: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Central Europe.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Relationship between work productivity and patient safety attitudes among intensive and critical care nurses: A structural equation modelling approach.Nursing in critical care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntensive care units present various challenges that can affect the productivity of nurses who play a critical role in ensuring patient safety; however, the relationship between these nurses' work productivity and patient safety attitudes has not been sufficiently explored.
aimTo investigate the relationship between work productivity and patient safety attitudes among intensive and critical care nurses (ICCNs) using structural equation modelling (SEM). STUDY
designThis cross-sectional study involved 372 ICCNs who were members of the Turkish Society of Critical Care Nurses. Data were collected via an online survey using the Nurse Information Form, the Attitudes Toward Productivity Scale (ATPS) and the Patient Safety Attitude Questionnaire (PSAQ).
resultsA significant positive correlation was found between the total ATPS and the PSAQ score (r = .704, p < .01). The SEM analysis revealed that teamwork climate (β = .192, p = .001), perceptions of management (β = .141, p = .001) and job satisfaction (β = .482, p = .001) positively predicted attitudes towards productivity, while stress recognition had a negative impact (β = -.219, p = .001). The model accounted for 62.2% of the variance in attitudes towards productivity and demonstrated good fit indices (χ
conclusionsTeamwork climate, perceptions of management, job satisfaction and stress recognition significantly influence work productivity among ICCNs. Enhancing these factors can improve ICCNs' productivity and foster positive patient safety attitudes, ultimately leading to better patient care outcomes in intensive care settings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Health care institutions need to adopt strategies to increase ICCNs' work productivity and patient safety attitudes, such as teamwork support initiatives, leadership development programmes for managers, professional development opportunities and stress reduction interventions. Positive working environment and favourable working conditions can improve ICCNs' well-being and performance, leading to better patient care outcomes in intensive care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.