Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012049›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Fetal brain development in fetal growth restriction using MRI: a systematic review.

L Meijerink, I M van Ooijen, T Alderliesten, F Terstappen, M J N L Benders, M N Bekker

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L MeijerinkDepartment of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, location Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, the Netherlands. l.meijerink-10@umcutrecht.nl.
I M van OoijenDepartment of Neonatology, Divison Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, location Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
T AlderliestenDepartment of Neonatology, Divison Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, location Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
F TerstappenDepartment of Neonatology, Divison Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, location Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
M J N L BendersDepartment of Neonatology, Divison Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, location Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
M N BekkerDepartment of Obstetrics, Division Woman and Baby, University Medical Center Utrecht, location Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review investigates potential differences in brain development between growth restricted (FGR)-fetuses compared to appropriate for gestational age (AGA) fetuses using MRI.

methodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from 1985 to 2023. FGR was defined as an estimated fetal weight (EFW) < p10 and/or an abdominal circumference (AC) < p10, or 20% reduction in EFW or AC using a minimum interval of two weeks. Outcomes included volumetrics, biometrics, apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC),

resultsTwenty-nine studies were included after three-phase screening, 13 used the FGR consensus definition according to the Delphi procedure. Total brain volume and cerebellar volume were significantly reduced in FGR fetuses (n = 183; 74) when compared to AGA fetuses (n = 283; 166) with a MD of -30.84 cm DISCUSSION: MRI provides additional information on fetal brain development in a growth restricted population. Smaller total brain and cerebellar volumes and lower ADC values in the FWM, OWM, TWM, thalami, CSO, basal ganglia, pons and cerebellum have been observed in FGR. These conclusions are drawn on relatively small sample sizes with high heterogeneity resulting from diverse study populations and MRI techniques. Furthermore, how these findings correlate to long-term neurocognitive abnormalities associated with FGR remains to be elucidated. A large cohort study comparing brain maturation, myelination, metabolic and hemodynamic status between brain-sparing FGR fetuses to healthy age-matched controls is needed.

Indexed as

BrainFetal DevelopmentFetal Growth RetardationMagnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGestational AgeHumansPregnancyBrain developmentFetal growth restrictionFetal MRISystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40012049
PMCPMC11863776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.