ArticleBMC primary care2025
The effect of an intervention for organizing primary mental health care in Brazil: a study based on routine process indicators.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe "Mental Health Care in Primary Health Care (PHC)" project (SMAPS, from Portuguese) was developed in six health regions from three Brazilian states. Considering the gap and relevance of monitoring and assessing mental health (MH) care in real-world settings using data from service records, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of SMAPS on indicators of MH care process in PHC, calculated from official records available in health services.
methodsThis is a pilot study conducted between January 2022 and September 2023. The sample comprised 18 PHC units in 14 municipalities, which were in one of the three Brazilian states that adhered to SMAPS and assigned to one of two groups: control and intervention (2:1). Secondary data were collected at two times using the same instrument to systematize the retrieval of aggregated data, which were extracted from management reports from PHC units or municipalities departments. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics at the PHC units or municipality level.
resultsThe rate of referrals to MH specialties per consultation with a MH classifications record seemed to decline in intervention and control group. The percentage of benzodiazepine medications delivered for PHC decreased from 16.1 to 11.3% in the intervention group municipalities but increased from 20.3 to 24.1% in the control group. An inverse pattern was observed for antipsychotic, anticonvulsant, and antidepressant medications (increased from 82.2 to 86.2% in the intervention group municipalities and declined from 77.6 to 74.4% in the control group). Despite this, analyzing the mean variation in MH care indicators, statistically significant differences between groups in distribution at the 5% level were not identified.
conclusionThe present pilot study points to possible effects of SMAPS for organizing MH care in PHC, especially regarding the referrals to specialty mental health care and the delivery of psychotropic medications. It contributes to the formulation of proposals for evaluating MH care based on data already available from records and reports from health services and emphasizes the need to improve the quality of MH care recording in PHC work routines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.