Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40012018›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Do achievers tend to share goodness with the world? The effect of subjective social status on prosocial risky behavior.

Changlin Liu, Yanan Hong, Huihan Yang, Youlong Zhan, Ping Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Changlin LiuDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China.
Yanan HongDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China.
Huihan YangDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China.
Youlong ZhanDepartment of Psychology, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, 411201, China.
Ping HuDepartment of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China. huping@ruc.edu.cn.

Funding

National Social Science Foundation of China (Major Program) 19ZDA021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The crisis of inequality in human society has profound implications, particularly in the context of risky helping dilemmas. This study examined the relationship between subjective social status and prosocial risky behavior (PRB) and its mediating mechanisms at both the trait and situational levels. Study 1 examined the relationship between trait subjective social status, holistic thinking, and PRB intention using a questionnaire. Study 2 further examined the causal relationships between situational subjective social status and PRB, their boundary conditions, and mediating mechanisms using experimental methods. The results showed that low-status individuals (vs. high-status individuals) tended to engage in more PRB for both trait and situational subjective social status. This difference existed only in the high-risk level condition. Furthermore, holistic thinking mediated the relationship between subjective social status and PRB. This has important implications for mitigating the negative impacts of social status disparities on individual psychology and behavior, promoting the enhancement of prosocial levels among individuals of different social statuses in risky situations.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingSocial BehaviorSocial StatusAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHolistic thinkingProsocial risky behaviorRisk levelSubjective social status

Identifiers

PMID40012018
PMCPMC11866616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.