ArticleJournal of ovarian research2025
Exploring new frontiers in oncofertility preservation: a case of ovarian stimulation during pregnancy.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decision-Making About Fertility Preservation After Cancer Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experiences and Perspectives.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe standard treatment for Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer (PABC) includes surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which can impair fertility, emphasizing the critical need for fertility preservation in these patients. This case report discusses a breast cancer patient who was found to be pregnant shortly after starting treatment. Despite the pregnancy and increased levels of βHCG and progesterone, the ovarian stimulation cycle yielded a satisfactory number of mature oocytes and high-quality embryos. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old woman, G1Ab1 (Gravida1Abortion1), who was diagnosed with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma with negative receptors (Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2) was referred to the oncofertility unit of the Royan Infertility Center for fertility preservation prior to the commencement of chemotherapy. Following necessary consultations and procedures, and confirming a negative pregnancy test, a random start letrozole-based protocol was initiated for ovarian stimulation. During the cycle, a positive pregnancy test was encountered. Despite the positive test, the cycle continued, and on day 13 of the cycle, triggering was performed with a GnRH agonist. A puncture was performed 36 h later, yielding 12 oocytes and 8 embryos.
conclusionThis case highlights the feasibility of adapting random-start ovarian stimulation protocols during pregnancy, warranting further investigation in similar clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.