ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025
Successful desensitization to horse antithymocyte globulin for aplastic anemia: two case reports and literature review.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHorse antithymocyte globulin (hATG) is an important therapeutic option for aplastic anemia (AA). However, hATG carries the risk of fatal anaphylaxis, and skin tests are performed to identify high-risk patients. We report on the successful desensitization of two AA patients with positive skin tests to hATG. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: A 72-year-old man with a history of successful treatment with rabbit ATG was referred for pancytopenia. Neutrophil, reticulocyte, and platelet counts were 546 /µL, 32,000 /µL, and 19,000 /µL, despite the oral administration of eltrombopag and cyclosporine. Bone marrow biopsy showed hypocellularity, and he was diagnosed with relapsed severe AA. Case 2: A 69-year-old man was referred for anemia and thrombocytopenia, and diagnosed with non-severe AA. Neutrophil, reticulocyte, and platelet counts were 2,044 /µL, 23,000 /µL, and 37,000 /µL. Bone marrow biopsy revealed hypocellularity. Neither patient had a history of allergy, and the skin prick test (SPT) of hATG was negative, but the intradermal test (IDT) was positive. The result of the IDT in case 2 was reproducible. They received hATG desensitization under close monitoring of vital signs in our high-care unit. The protocol consisted of gradually increasing doses of hATG (four intradermal, two subcutaneous, and four intravenous (IV) push) and some premedications prior to administration of the full dose IV drip. They completed the course without developing any systemic allergic reactions.
conclusionsDespite the risk of anaphylaxis, hATG desensitization can be beneficial in AA patients with a positive skin test, especially when no alternative is available or hATG is preferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.