ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Prioritisation of head, neck, and respiratory outcomes in mucopolysaccharidosis type II: lessons from a rare disease consensus exercise and comparison of parental and clinical priorities.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II in Young Children from the Caregiver's Perspective: A Qualitative Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Caregiver Reports of Neurodevelopmental Functions in Pediatric Lysosomal Storage Disorders: A Scoping Review.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe mucopolysaccharidoses are a group of rare, inherited metabolic disorders. MPS II is a X-linked recessive disease, also known as Hunter syndrome. Clinical manifestations include upper and lower respiratory tract, and head and neck pathologies influencing quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Medical and surgical intervention outcomes for MPS are reported inconsistently, creating a challenge when synthesising and contrasting evidence. This study set out to address the inconsistency in outcome measurement in this field. International recommendations for developing a core outcome set were adopted. Available data from qualitative studies and outcomes from a modified e-Delphi surveys were used to develop a list of candidate outcomes for consideration. Three consensus meetings with patients diagnosed with MPS II alongside their parents/carers were ran to help finalise a list of outcome domains.
resultsSurvival, airway obstruction, and quality of life were outcomes identified as important to always measure in all MPS II clinical trials and/or in clinical practice. Other outcomes for younger children included swallowing difficulties, cognitive development, ability to participate in education, and communication. The adolescent group included safety of chewing and swallowing, complications of anaesthesia, sleep quality and apnoea, nasal problems, and chronic otitis media. The adult group identified sleep apnoea, and hearing, as additional outcomes to measure.
conclusionsA novel methodology for determining a core outcome set in rare diseases has been recommended. Both functional and quality of life outcomes were identified by the three age groups of individuals and/or their parents. Adoption of these sets of outcomes in future clinical trials and/or clinical practice will enable comparison of outcomes reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.