ArticleJournal of intensive care2025
Population-specific genetic-risk scores enable improved prediction of mortality within 28 days of sepsis onset: a retrospective Taiwanese cohort study.
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Among Melatonin Dysregulation, Sleep Disorders, and Sepsis-Associated Delirium: A Prospective Cohort Study with Mediation Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet and Risk of Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study from the UK Biobank.NPJ science of food · 2026Article
- Strength of Omics in Uncovering Sepsis Mechanisms-A Perspective.Current health sciences journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is characterized by organ dysfunction as a response to infection and is one of the leading causes of mortality and loss of health. The heterogeneous nature of sepsis, along with ethnic differences in susceptibility, challenges a thorough understanding of its etiology. This study aimed to propose prediction models by leveraging genetic-risk scores and clinical variables that can assist in risk stratification of patients.
methodsA total of 1,403 patients from Taiwan, diagnosed with sepsis, were utilized. Genome-wide survival analysis was conducted, with death within 28 days from sepsis onset, as the primary event to report significantly associated SNPs. A polygenic risk score (PRS-sepsis) was constructed via clumping and thresholding method which was added to clinical-only models to generate better performing prognostic models for identifying high-risk patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted using PRS-sepsis.
resultsA total of five single-nucleotide-polymorphisms (SNPs) reached genome-wide significance (p < 5e-8), and 86 SNPs reached suggestive significance (p < 1e-5). The prognostic model using PRS-sepsis showed significantly improved performance with c-index [confidence interval (CI)] of 0.79 [0.62-0.96] and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) [CI] of 0.78 [0.75-0.80], in comparison to clinical-only prognostic models (c-index [CI] = 0.63 [0.45- 0.81], AUROC [CI] = 0.61 [0.58-0.64]). The ethnic specificity was established for our proposed models by comparing it with models generated using significant SNPs from prior European studies (c-index [CI] = 0.63 [0.42-0.85], AUROC [CI] = 0.60 [0.58-0.63]). Kaplan-Meier plots showed that patient groups with higher PRSs have inferior survival probability compared to those with lower PRSs.
conclusionsThis study proposed genetic-risk models specific for Taiwanese populations that outperformed clinical-only models. Also it established a strong racial-effect on the underlying genetics of sepsis-related mortality. The model can potentially be used in real clinical setting for deciding precise treatment courses for patients at high-risk thereby reducing the possibility of worse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.