Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025
Physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) food labelling on discretionary foods in secondary school canteens in England: an efficacy cluster randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05623618 (A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Testing Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Testing Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent (PACE) Labelling on Discretionary Foods in Secondary Schools
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSchools do not typically implement food labelling in their canteens, therefore young people may not be given nutrition information on which to make their food choices. One way of expressing the energy/calorie content of foods is to provide this information in the form of physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) food labelling, which may help to contextualise the energy content of food/drinks to young people in a simple and understandable way. The study aimed to assess the usefulness of implementing PACE labelling in school canteens and to conduct a process evaluation of using this type of food labelling with young people.
methodsA parallel two-armed cluster RCT to evaluate a PACE labelling intervention in secondary schools (typically, adolescents aged 11 and above) in England was conducted. Schools were randomised on a 2:1 basis to display PACE labelling by cakes/sweet biscuits in canteens or to continue with usual practice (comparator) for up to six weeks. There was a baseline period of no PACE labelling for a minimum of four weeks in all schools. Anonymised purchase data were provided by schools and analysed both descriptively and using analysis of covariance.
resultsEighteen schools in England were randomised and 11 participated (6 intervention and 5 comparators). Analyses are based on ~ 99,000 purchase transactions of cakes and biscuits from participating schools. There was a reduction in cake/biscuit purchases in intervention schools versus comparators of ~ 11 items per week per 100 students at follow-up (adjusted mean difference = -0.112, 95% CI [-0.179 to -0.045], p = 0.005). Intervention schools did not report major difficulties with the implementation of PACE labelling.
conclusionsPACE labelling appeared to reduce cakes/biscuit purchases by a small amount and may be a useful approach to reducing the purchase of discretionary foods in young people in the school environment. The implementation of PACE labelling appeared feasible for some schools, but other schools had reservations about the adverse effects this type of labelling may have on the well-being of students.
trial registrationRegistered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 18th November 2022. NCT05623618, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05623618 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.