Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011946›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Validating the Turkish version of the team-based learning assessment scale: a psychometric evaluation.

Sevim Şen Olgay, Şevval Çağan Kişin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sevim Şen OlgayFaculty of Health Sciences Department of Nursing, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Kerem Aydınlar Kampüsü Kayışdağı Cad. 32 Atasehir, Istanbul, 34752, Türkiye. sevim.olgay@acibadem.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3301-4153
Şevval Çağan KişinFaculty of Health Sciences Department of Nursing, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5511-9751

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeam-based learning methods enhance course achievement, student success, and student satisfaction and are frequently used in nursing curricula. However, there is no valid and reliable tool for evaluating team-based learning in Türkiye. Adapting the Team-based Learning Student Assessment (TBL-SAI) into Turkish can provide a standardized and culturally appropriate evaluation tool, supporting nursing education practice and research. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the assessment (TBL-SAI-TR) among nursing students.

methodsThis descriptive and psychometrics study was conducted between October and November 2022. The sample consisted of 430 nursing students. The translation-back-translation method was used to determine the language accuracy of the scale. The content validity, construct validity, item analysis, and internal consistency analysis were used as psychometrics tests of the study.

resultsThe Cronbach's α value of the TBL-SAI-TR was .90. The item-total correlations of the 23-item three-factor scale, validated by confirmatory factor analysis, were between .30 and .74, and the intraclass correlations were between .88 and .90.

conclusionThis study showed that the TBL-SAI-TR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing team-based learning among Turkish nursing students.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementProblem-Based LearningStudents, NursingAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsTurkeyYoung AdultActive learningNursing studentsPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID40011946
PMCPMC11866590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.