ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Real-world analysis of the efficacy and safety of nusinersen in pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nusinersen: the antisense oligonucleotide at the forefront of spinal muscular atrophy treatment.RNA biology · 2026Review
- The Dynamics of Neurofilament Light Chain in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Defining When Nusinersen Starts to Work: Time to Clinical Benefit in Patients with SMA Types 1-3 from a Real-World Cohort in China.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-world evidence on nusinersen treatment of persons with SMA: a focused review.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Motor function and safety of nusinersen for spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis among Chinese patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neurodegenerative disease that significantly affects multiple systems in children. Nusinersen, the first approved treatment for SMA, enhances SMN protein production by targeting the RNA splicing site of the SMN2 gene, thus improving motor function. However, the high cost of nusinersen treatment raises concerns about its economic feasibility.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 42 pediatric SMA patients treated with nusinersen from January 2022 to October 2024 at our hospital. We assessed the efficacy, safety, and economic impact of nusinersen in different SMA types. Motor function was evaluated using the CHOP-INTEND, HINE-2, HFMSE, and RULM scales. Safety was assessed based on adverse reactions and events, and economic evaluation considered total treatment costs and average cost per injection.
resultsNusinersen significantly improved motor function in SMA patients, especially in type I patients, who showed notable increases in CHOP-INTEND and HINE-2 scores. The RULM score had the highest increase among type II patients, while improvements were relatively lower in type III patients. Regarding safety, the incidence of adverse events was 40.48%, with fever being the most common adverse reaction, occurring in 36.36% of cases. Economic analysis indicated that the total treatment cost was highest for type III patients, though the cost differences among types were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).
conclusionNusinersen demonstrated significant clinical efficacy and favorable safety in pediatric SMA patients, with improved economic feasibility after insurance coverage. Our findings support early SMA screening and presymptomatic nusinersen administration to maximize therapeutic benefits. Further multicenter, large-sample, long-term follow-up studies are warranted to validate and expand upon these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.