Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011914›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2025

Comprehensive genetic variant analysis reveals combination of KRAS and LRP1B as a predictive biomarker of response to immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Ella A Eklund, Johanna Svensson, Louise Stauber Näslund, Maria Yhr, Sama I Sayin, Clotilde Wiel, Levent M Akyürek, Per Torstensson, Volkan I Sayin, Andreas Hallqvist and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. COPD-Lung Cancer Comorbidity: Mechanistic Insights and Precision Oncology Implications.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ella A Eklund *Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johanna Svensson *Department of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Louise Stauber NäslundDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Maria YhrDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sama I SayinSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Clotilde WielSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Levent M AkyürekDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Institute for Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Per TorstenssonDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden.
Volkan I SayinSahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Andreas HallqvistDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sukanya RaghavanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute for Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anna RohlinDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. anna.rohlin@vgregion.se.

Funding

Cancerfonden 21/1721Cancerfonden 23-3062Department of Laboratory Medicine region 4 at Sahlgrenska University Hospital,Sweden 2022, 2023, 2024Stiftelsen Assar Gabrielssons Fond FB20-59, FB21-12, FB22-07, FB23-68The Gothenburg Society of Medicine 2019; 19/889991The Healthcare Board of the region West Sweden VGFOUREG940206, 968617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the rapid advancement of predictive genetic testing of tumors by identifying specific pathogenic driver variants has significantly improved treatment guidance. However, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is typically administered to patients with tumors in the absence of such driver variants. Since only about 30% of patients will respond to ICB treatment, identifying novel genetic biomarkers of clinical response is crucial and will improve treatment decisions. This prospective clinical study aims to combine molecular biology, advanced bioinformatics and clinical data on response to treatment with ICB from a prospective cohort of NSCLC patients to identify single or combination of genetic variants in the tumor that can serve as predictive biomarkers of clinical response.

methodsIn this prospective bi-center clinical study, we performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 597 cancer-associated genes in a prospective cohort of 49 patients as the final cohort analyzed, with stage III or IV NSCLC, followed by establishment of an in-house developed bioinformatics-based molecular classification method that integrates, interprets and evaluates data from multiple databases and variant prediction tools. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed for selected candidate genes and variants identified using our novel methodology including molecular tools, databases and clinical information.

resultsOur novel molecular interpretation and classification method identified high impact variants in frequently altered genes KRAS, LRP1B, and TP53. Analysis of these genes as single predictive biomarkers in ICB-treated patients revealed that the presence of likely pathogenic variants and variants of unclear significance in LRP1B was associated with improved OS (p = 0.041). Importantly, further analysis of variant combinations in the tumor showed that co-occurrence of KRAS and LRP1B variants significantly improved OS (p = 0.003) and merged PFS (p = 0.008). Notably, the triple combination of variants in KRAS, LRP1B, and TP53 positively impacted both OS (p = 0.026) and merged PFS (p = 0.003).

conclusionsThis study suggests that combination of the LRP1B and KRAS variants identified through our novel molecular classification scheme leads to better outcomes following ICB treatment in NSCLC. The addition of TP53 improves the outcome even further. To our knowledge, this is the first report indicating that harboring a combination of KRAS, LRP1B, and TP53 variants can significantly enhance the response to ICB, suggesting a novel predictive biomarker combination for NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AdultAgedFemaleGenetic VariationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesReceptors, LDLBiomarkers, TumorKRAS protein, humanLRP1B protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Receptors, LDLBiomarkerICBKRASLRP1BNSCLCTP53Variant classification

Identifiers

PMID40011914
PMCPMC11866712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.