ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
ChromInst: a multicentre evaluation of robustness in aneuploidy and structural rearrangement testing.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and for chromosomal structural rearrangement (PGT-A/-SR) can improve clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates, and shorten the time to pregnancy. The large-scale statistics on their efficacy and accuracy across different centres, as well as the frequency of abnormalities for each chromosome, will provide a valuable supplement to previous research.
methodsPatients who had PGT-A or -SR procedures at five reproductive centres from 2018 to 2022 were recruited based on PGT-A/-SR indications. ChromInst and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based PGT technology were utilised to detect copy number variations in embryos. Sequencing data metrics such as median absolute pairwise difference (MAPD) and detection success rate were analysed to evaluate the robustness of ChromInst. To assess ChromInst's accuracy, the chromosomal results from amniocentesis, abortions, and neonatal blood was as the gold standard for negative PGT results; the fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), which was performed on embryos that identified as aneuploid through PGT was as the gold standard for positive PGT results. The frequency of abnormalities in each chromosome was also explored in aneuploid embryos.
resultsA total of 5,730 embryos were tested from 1,015 patients in the study, 391 of whom had PGT-A and 624 of whom had PGT-SR. 99.5% (5,699/5,730) of the embryos had an NGS sequencing MAPD value < 0.25, and 99.3% (5,689/5,730) of the embryos achieved successful PGT-A/-SR detection. Compared with the gold standard, the concordance of negative PGT-A/-SR results was 99.8% (506/507), and that of positive results was 99.8% (1,123/1,125). The euploidy rate in the PGT-A population was 45.9% (981/2,135). The proportion of euploid + balanced embryos was highest among couples with non-polymorphic inversions (44.6%, 152/341), followed by those with Robertsonian translocations (39.0%, 293/752), and lowest among those with reciprocal translocations (22.5%, 483/2,143). Chromosomes 16, 22, and 15 had the highest frequency of autosomal trisomies among the embryos from PGT-A patients, while chromosomes 16, 22, and 21 had the highest frequency of monosomies. High-frequency chromosomes with de novo chromosomal abnormalities for trisomies and monosomies were similar in the PGT-SR patients to those in the PGT-A patients.
conclusionsChromInst-based PGT-A/-SR could accommodate operational variations among different clinical centres, ensuring accurate results through robust and stable detection performance. Prior to PGT-A/-SR, more trustworthy data could be provided to support the genetic counselling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.