ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
CSEPC: a deep learning framework for classifying small-sample multimodal medical image data in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3DViT-GAT: a unified atlas-based 3D vision transformer and graph learning framework for major depressive disorder detection using structural MRI data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mind the Gap: Does Brain Age Improve Alzheimer's Disease Prediction?Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that significantly impacts health care worldwide, particularly among the elderly population. The accurate classification of AD stages is essential for slowing disease progression and guiding effective interventions. However, limited sample sizes continue to present a significant challenge in classifying the stages of AD progression. Addressing this obstacle is crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy and optimizing treatment strategies for those affected by AD.
methodsIn this study, we proposed cross-scale equilibrium pyramid coupling (CSEPC), which is a novel diagnostic algorithm designed for small-sample multimodal medical imaging data. CSEPC leverages scale equilibrium theory and modal coupling properties to integrate semantic features from different imaging modalities and across multiple scales within each modality. The architecture first extracts balanced multiscale features from structural MRI (sMRI) data and functional MRI (fMRI) data using a cross-scale pyramid module. These features are then combined through a contrastive learning-based cosine similarity coupling mechanism to capture intermodality associations effectively. This approach enhances the representation of both inter- and intramodal features while significantly reducing the number of learning parameters, making it highly suitable for small sample environments. We validated the effectiveness of the CSEPC model through experiments on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset and demonstrated its superior performance in diagnosing and staging AD.
resultsOur experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model matches or exceeds the performance of models used in previous studies in AD classification. Specifically, the model achieved an accuracy of 85.67% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 in classifying the progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD. To further validate its effectiveness, we used our method to diagnose different stages of AD. In both classification tasks, our approach delivered superior performance.
conclusionsIn conclusion, the performance of our model in various tasks has demonstrated its significant potential in the field of small-sample multimodal medical imaging classification, particularly AD classification. This advancement could significantly assist clinicians in effectively managing and intervening in the disease progression of patients with early-stage AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.