ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Utilization of tree-based machine learning models for predicting low birth weight cases.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive modeling with machine learning for low birth weight in the state of São Paulo: a retrospective population-based study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2026Article
- Prediction of birthweight with early and mid-pregnancy antenatal markers utilising machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow birth weight (LBW) is a health condition that affects over 20 million gestational outcomes worldwide. The current literature indicates that machine learning models have the potential to assist healthcare professionals in predicting LBW and giving them the opportunity to intervene earlier in the pregnancy, which might include adjusting medical treatments or suggesting changes in diet. PURPOSE: This study proposes the evaluation of machine learning models to predict which pregnant women are at risk of neonatal outcomes with LBW.
methodsThe methodology involves six phases, including data analysis and attribute selection through different techniques, which generated four distinct scenarios. We used five machine learning models and validated them through cross-validation and hyper-parameter optimization and evaluated their performance considering seven distinct metrics and statistical analysis, focusing on the effectiveness of the models in predicting LBW.
resultsThe results revealed that the models achieved varying levels of performance across the scenarios, with the removal of duplicate data resulting in improvements in recall (0.83) and f1-score (0.64). Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences (p < 0.05) among most models.
conclusionsThe conclusions of this study indicate that the removal of duplicate data and careful attribute selection positively influenced the performance of the machine learning models in predicting low birth weight. Additionally, the analysis of attribute importance highlighted socio-demographic characteristics and gestational history as the most influential in the training of the models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.