Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011804›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Utilization of tree-based machine learning models for predicting low birth weight cases.

Flavio Leandro de Morais, Elisson da Silva Rocha, Gabriel Masson, Dimas Cassimiro do Nascimento Filho, Katia Maria Mendes, Raphael Augusto de Sousa Dourado, Waldemar Brandao Neto, Patricia Takako Endo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Flavio Leandro de MoraisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Elisson da Silva RochaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Gabriel MassonPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Dimas Cassimiro do Nascimento FilhoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Katia Maria MendesCentro Universitário Integrado de Saude Amaury de Medeiros (CISAM), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Raphael Augusto de Sousa DouradoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Waldemar Brandao NetoPrograma de Residência Multiprofissional em Neonatologia, Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Patricia Takako EndoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia da Computação (PPGEC), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. patricia.endo@upe.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow birth weight (LBW) is a health condition that affects over 20 million gestational outcomes worldwide. The current literature indicates that machine learning models have the potential to assist healthcare professionals in predicting LBW and giving them the opportunity to intervene earlier in the pregnancy, which might include adjusting medical treatments or suggesting changes in diet. PURPOSE: This study proposes the evaluation of machine learning models to predict which pregnant women are at risk of neonatal outcomes with LBW.

methodsThe methodology involves six phases, including data analysis and attribute selection through different techniques, which generated four distinct scenarios. We used five machine learning models and validated them through cross-validation and hyper-parameter optimization and evaluated their performance considering seven distinct metrics and statistical analysis, focusing on the effectiveness of the models in predicting LBW.

resultsThe results revealed that the models achieved varying levels of performance across the scenarios, with the removal of duplicate data resulting in improvements in recall (0.83) and f1-score (0.64). Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences (p < 0.05) among most models.

conclusionsThe conclusions of this study indicate that the removal of duplicate data and careful attribute selection positively influenced the performance of the machine learning models in predicting low birth weight. Additionally, the analysis of attribute importance highlighted socio-demographic characteristics and gestational history as the most influential in the training of the models.

Indexed as

Infant, Low Birth WeightMachine LearningAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyLow birth weightMachine learningPredictionPrenatal care

Identifiers

PMID40011804
PMCPMC11863662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.