ArticleCommunications biology2025
Neural synchronization and its impact on intergroup attitudes in dynamic interactions.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In sync through laughter? An fNIRS hyperscanning study on neural synchrony and social connection.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Aberrant multi-brain neurodynamics drive atypical social cooperation and competition in heroin use disorder: An fNIRS-based hyperscanning study.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic transitions between competition and cooperation are common in real-world intergroup interactions, yet prior research has typically examined competition or cooperation in isolation. This study explored how transitions between competition and cooperation influenced intergroup attitudes and the neural processes involved. Using functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning, we recorded brain activity from 69 dyads during interactions. Results showed that cooperation enhanced neural synchronization in the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ), leading to more positive outgroup attitudes. In contrast, competition increased synchronization in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC), correlating with decreased outgroup likability. The sequence of interactions was critical, with the first interaction exerting a carryover effect on the next. Cooperation buffered the negative effects of later competition, while competition weakened the positive effects of subsequent cooperation. These findings emphasized the importance of understanding dynamic intergroup interactions and highlighted the potential of cooperation to mitigate biases and improve intergroup relations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.