ArticleSpinal cord2025
Clinical signs and symptoms for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a scoping review of case-control studies to facilitate early diagnosis among healthcare professionals with stakeholder engagement.
Article in Spinal cord, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leg Pain Due to Chronic Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy: Correspondence.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and degenerative cervical myelopathy: phenotype-based diagnostic pitfalls, investigative mismatch, and practical clinical reasoning.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Application and performance of deep learning models for the automated diagnosis of cervical central spinal stenosis on MRI: a systematic review.Brain & spine · 2026Review
- Redefining Chemotherapy-Related Headaches: From Pathobiology to Differential Diagnosis and Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Subclinical knee extensor weakness predicts gait and balance impairment in degenerative cervical myelopathy.GeroScience · 2025Observational
- MYNAH Registry: A novel approach to decoding the natural history of degenerative cervical myelopathy.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
designScoping Review.
objectiveDegenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a leading cause of chronic spinal cord dysfunction, with diverse clinical presentations that complicate diagnosis. Therefore, it is important to identify the signs and symptoms of DCM that demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy. This review aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of signs and symptoms in diagnosing DCM.
methodsArticles up to June 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases using search terms like "degenerative cervical myelopathy", "cervical spondylotic myelopathy", "sensitivity", "specificity", and related signs and symptoms. Studies were screened based on selection criteria assessing the sensitivity and specificity of signs or symptoms using an appropriate control group.
resultsSixteen studies were included. The most sensitive signs were Tromner sign (93-97%) and hyperreflexia (15-85%). Specific signs included the Babinski sign (93-100%), Tromner sign (79-100%), clonus (96-99%), and inverted supinator sign (78-99%). Neck pain had a sensitivity of 76-94% and specificity of 11-73%. Hand incoordination showed 52% sensitivity and 92% specificity. Altered hand sensation had 76% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Upper extremity weakness had 51-75% sensitivity and 18-95% specificity. Gait imbalance exhibited 56-63% sensitivity and 52-95% specificity.
conclusionSensitive signs like the Tromner sign and hyperreflexia are useful for screening, while specific signs such as Babinski, clonus, and the inverted supinator sign aid in confirmation of DCM. Symptoms like neck pain, hand incoordination, and altered hand sensation should heighten suspicion and guide differential diagnosis. Early and accurate diagnosis using these indicators can improve patient outcomes and reduce diagnostic delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.