Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011683›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Pygmaclypeatus daziensis, a unique lower Cambrian arthropod with two different compound eye systems.

Michel Schmidt, Brigitte Schoenemann, Xianguang Hou, Roland R Melzer, Yu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michel Schmidt *Yunnan Key Laboratory for Palaeobiology, Yunnan University, Yunnan University, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Brigitte Schoenemann *Department of Biology, Institute of Zoology (Neurobiology, Animal Physiology), University of Cologne, Biocentre, Cologne, Germany. B.Schoenemann@uni-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4846-0255
Xianguang HouYunnan Key Laboratory for Palaeobiology, Yunnan University, Yunnan University, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Roland R MelzerMEC International Joint Laboratory for Palaeobiology and Palaeoenvironment, Yunnan University, Yunnan University, Kunming, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7853-6604
Yu LiuYunnan Key Laboratory for Palaeobiology, Yunnan University, Yunnan University, Kunming, People's Republic of China. yu.liu@ynu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2346-740X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than half a billion years ago, a high diversity of organisms appeared in the fossil record. All major clades we know today already existed, and arthropods dominated the marine faunas. Many were already equipped with a pair of elaborated compound eyes on top of movable eye stalks. Some of them also possessed 3-4 small single-aperture eyes, so-called median eyes. Just trilobites possessed sessile dorsal eyes. One pair of compound eyes/lateral eyes is considered plesiomorphic and is a common trait for euarthropods. Here, we describe an arthropod that possessed two independent compound eye systems-a pair of stalked and a pair of tiny sessile dorsal trilobite-like compound eyes, unique in the arthropod kingdom so far. A competition between prey and predators for the capacity of vision triggered the evolution of visual systems, and we discuss this newly described system(s) in its evolutionary context and ecological significance. Regarding its eye system phylogenetically, P. daziensis reinforces the position of a now non-missing link between the non-trilobite artiopodans and trilobites.

Indexed as

ArthropodsCompound Eye, ArthropodFossilsAnimalsBiological EvolutionEyePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID40011683
PMCPMC11865447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.