ArticleBone marrow transplantation2025
Long-term patient-reported outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of Life in CAR-T Cell Therapy.Hematology reports · 2026Review
- Richter Transformation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Current Treatment Challenges and Evolving Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic progress has improved the overall survival of patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Thus, the impact on quality of life (QoL) becomes increasingly relevant. However, QoL is not monitored regularly in clinical practice, and most trials stop QoL assessments early post-alloHCT, missing long-term dynamics. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 214 adult alloHCT recipients (average age 53 y, 42.5% female, median follow-up 56 months) to evaluate QoL using patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), spanning a period from 30 days to over 10 years post-transplant. Participants completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-BMT at a single follow-up timepoint to investigate QoL-related factors. Comparing long-term follow-up patients (beyond year 3, n = 125) with short-term follow-up patients (day 30 to month 12, n = 89) shows significantly better long-term QoL outcomes (P = 0.016). However, PROM symptom scales indicate moderate fatigue and insomnia rates in long-term survivors. Better QoL was associated with male gender, lower ECOG, RIC conditioning, no relapse, no ongoing immunosuppression and full-time work. Summarized, while we observe encouraging long-term outcomes, our data suggest that QoL recovery remain highly individual. We strongly recommend the use of PROMs to enhance our understanding of long-term survivorship post-alloHCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.