ArticleScientific reports2025
Topic modeling analysis of the Allen Human Brain Atlas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel cancer subtyping method guided by tumor-normal sample in latent space of transcriptomic variational autoencoder.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the latent space of transcriptomic data with topic modeling.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human brain is a complex interconnected structure controlling all elementary and high-level cognitive tasks. It is composed of many regions that exhibit specific distributions of cell types and distinct patterns of functional connections. This complexity is rooted in differential transcription. The constituent cell types of different brain regions express distinctive combinations of genes as they develop and mature, ultimately shaping their functional state in adulthood. How precisely the genetic information of anatomical structures is connected to their underlying biological functions remains an open question in modern neuroscience. A major challenge is the identification of "universal patterns", which do not depend on the particular individual, but are instead basic structural properties shared by all brains. Despite the vast amount of gene expression data available at both the bulk and single-cell levels, this task remains challenging, mainly due to the lack of suitable data mining tools. In this paper, we propose an approach to address this issue based on a hierarchical version of Stochastic Block Modeling. Thanks to its specific choice of priors, the method is particularly effective in identifying these universal features. We use as a laboratory to test our algorithm a dataset obtained from six independent human brains from the Allen Human Brain Atlas. We show that the proposed method is indeed able to identify universal patterns much better than more traditional algorithms such as Latent Dirichlet Allocation or Weighted Correlation Network Analysis. The probabilistic association between genes and samples that we find well represents the known anatomical and functional brain organization. Moreover, leveraging the peculiar "fuzzy" structure of the gene sets obtained with our method, we identify examples of transcriptional and post-transcriptional pathways associated with specific brain regions, highlighting the potential of our approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.