ArticleScientific reports2025
A colonic polyps detection algorithm based on an improved YOLOv5s.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep learning driven colorectal polyp analysis: a review of detection, classification and segmentation methods.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for reducing missed detection of adenomas and polyps in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- An enhanced fusion of transfer learning models with optimization based clinical diagnosis of lung and colon cancer using biomedical imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An efficient fine tuning strategy of segment anything model for polyp segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colon cancer is a prevalent malignancy, substantially it prevented most effectively from killing patients through early endoscopic detection. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, the early diagnosis rate of colonic polyps achieves greater clinical efficacy for colon cancer by applying target detection algorithms to colonoscopy images. This paper presents two outcomes achieved through the application of the improved YOLOv5s algorithm with annotated microscopy images of clinical cases and publicly available polyp image data: (1) enhancement of the C3(Cross Stage Partial Networks) module with multiple layers to C3SE(Cross Stage Partial Networks with Squeeze-and-Excitation) via the attention mechanism SE (squeeze-and-excitation) and (2) fusion of higher-level features utilizing BiFPN (the weighted bi-directional feature pyramid network). Experimental comparisons are performed based on a new image dataset of colonic polyps among more than 6 target detection algorithms to validate the better detection capability. The tests indicate that the YOLOv5s + BiFPN and YOLOv5s-1st-2nd-C3SE models exhibit enhancements of detection capability compared to the YOLOv5 algorithm according to the main indicators of the mAP, accuracy, and recall. The YOLOv5s + SEBiFPN model demonstrate a substantial improvement over the YOLOv5s algorithm, and establishing a benchmark technology for advancing computer-assisted diagnostic systems is feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.