Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011589›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of high-sensitivity flow cytometry on peri-transplant minimal residual disease kinetics in acute leukemia.

Ana Paula de Azambuja, Miriam Perlingeiro Beltrame, Mariester Malvezzi, Yara Carolina Schluga, Julie Lillian Pimentel Justus, Alberto Cardoso Martins Lima, Vaneuza Araujo Moreira Funke, Carmem Bonfim, Ricardo Pasquini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana Paula de AzambujaBone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil. apazamb@gmail.com.
Miriam Perlingeiro BeltrameFlow Cytometry Laboratory, Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Curitiba, Brazil.
Mariester MalvezziFlow Cytometry Laboratory, Hospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná, Avenida Nossa Senhora da Luz, 487, apto 601, 82510-020, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Yara Carolina SchlugaFlow Cytometry Laboratory, Hospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná, Avenida Nossa Senhora da Luz, 487, apto 601, 82510-020, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Julie Lillian Pimentel JustusFlow Cytometry Laboratory, Hospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná, Avenida Nossa Senhora da Luz, 487, apto 601, 82510-020, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Alberto Cardoso Martins LimaHistocompatibility Laboratory, Hospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Vaneuza Araujo Moreira FunkeBone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Carmem BonfimInstituto de Pesquisa Pele Pequeno Príncipe/Faculdades Pequeno Principe Príncipe, Curitiba, Brazil.
Ricardo PasquiniBone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.

Funding

Programa Nacional de Apoio à Atenção Oncológica (PRONON) Processo NUP: 25000.055356/2015-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) detected before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with high-risk acute leukemia. However, the ideal time points for post-transplant MRD assessment and the clinical significance of low levels of residual disease in this context are unclear. We conducted a prospective real-world analysis of high-sensitivity flow cytometry MRD performed before and after transplant (at days 30, 60 and 100) in 77 acute leukemia patients. The aim was to evaluate the kinetics of disease elimination and correlate it with transplant outcomes. Pre-transplant MRD was negative in 42 (MRD-) and positive in 35 patients (MRD+). Post-transplant MRD assessment was feasible at day 30 (n = 30, 38.9%), day 60 (n = 27, 35.0%) and day 100 (n = 60, 77.9%). Relapses occurred in 8 patients in the MRD + group (22.9%) and three in the MRD-negative group (7.1%), p = 0.02. Pre-transplant MRD correlated with a decrease in overall survival (OS; 87.9% MRD- vs. 54.0% MRD+) and event-free survival (EFS; 85.3% MRD- vs. 51.1% MRD+), p = 0.001. Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 17.5% in MRD + vs. 2.6% in MRD- (p = 0.049). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 31.4% in MRD + vs. 12.1% in MRD- (p = 0.019). One-year OS was higher in patients with negative MRD at d100 (92.4%, 95% CI: 0.81-0.971) than positive d100 MRD (53.3%, 95% CI: 0.177-0.796), p < 0.0001. Disease status and d100 MRD were associated with OS, EFS and CIR. Differences in NRM between leukemia types (ALL: 18.9% MRD- vs. 50% MRD+, and AML 0% MRD- vs. 21.7% MRD+, p = 0.0158) were also observed. In conclusion, pre-transplant MRD assessed by highly sensitive flow cytometry accurately identified patients with adverse prognoses. Persistent MRD after HCT could predict relapse with high specificity and clinical sensitivity. These results highlight the importance of incorporating peri-transplant MRD kinetics into the routine treatment of acute leukemia, particularly in low/middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasm, ResidualPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKineticsMaleMiddle AgedAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaAcute myeloid leukemiaAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationBiomarkersFlow cytometryMeasurable residual diseaseMinimal residual disease

Identifiers

PMID40011589
PMCPMC11865467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.