Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011573›Full record

ReviewOncogene2025

Molecular mechanisms altering cell identity in cancer.

Alessio Zippo, Sven Beyes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alessio ZippoDepartment of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), University of Trento, Trento, Italy. alessio.zippo@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3686-6151
Sven BeyesRobert Bosch Center for Tumor Diseases (RBCT), Stuttgart, Germany. sven.beyes@bosch-health-campus.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7665-6829

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Italian Association for Cancer Research) IG 2019-22911Robert Bosch Stiftung (Robert Bosch Foundation) not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsic and extrinsic factors influence cancer cell identity throughout its lifespan. During tumor progression and metastasis formation, cancer cells are exposed to different environmental stimuli, resulting in a stepwise cellular reprogramming. Similar stepwise changes of cell identity have been shown as a major consequence of cancer treatment, as cells are exposed to extracellular stress that can result in the establishment of subpopulations exhibiting different epigenetic and transcriptional patterns, indicating a rapid adaptation mechanism of cellular identity by extrinsic stress factors. Both mechanisms, tumor progression-mediated changes and therapy response, rely on signaling pathways affecting the epigenetic and subsequent transcriptional landscape, which equip the cells with mechanisms for survival and tumor progression. These non-genetic alterations are propagated to the daughter cells, indicating a need for successful information propagation and transfer to the daughter generations, thereby allowing for a stepwise adaptation to environmental cues. However, the exact mechanisms how these cell identity changes are occurring, which context-specific mechanisms are behind and how this can be exploited for future therapeutic interventions is not yet fully understood and exploited. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge on cell identity maintenance mechanisms intra- and intergenerational in development and disease and how these mechanisms are altered in cancer. We will as well address how cancer treatment might target these properties.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAnimalsEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansSignal Transduction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.