ArticleScientific reports2025
Determining the optimal port placement for transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach in a retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasing popularity of minimally invasive techniques in thyroid surgery, the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) has garnered significant attention. This study aimed to compare the impact of different distances between the observation and operation ports in TOETVA on clinical treatment outcomes. Ninety patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the distance between the observation and operation ports, they were divided into three groups: Group A (2.3-2.7 cm), Group B (less than 2.3 cm), and Group C (more than 2.7 cm). All three groups underwent TOETVA performed by the same surgical team. Operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, drainage volume, retrieved and metastatic central lymph nodes, postoperative complications, and tumor recurrence were compared among the groups. There were no demographic differences among the three groups. Compared to Groups B and C, patients in Group A had significantly shorter operation times, lower postoperative drainage volumes, and shorter postoperative hospital stays (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in bleeding amount, retrieved and metastatic central lymph nodes, or incidence of complications among the groups. No postoperative recurrences were observed in any patient. In TOETVA, the best surgical outcomes were achieved when the distance between the observation and operation ports was approximately 2.5 cm (2.3-2.7 cm). This configuration ensures smooth surgical operations and facilitates postoperative rehabilitation, making it worthy of further clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.