Observational studyScientific reports2025
Personalized contrast agent dosing to prevent contrast induced nephropathy in high risk populations in Guangdong, China.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on risk factors and early predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- A comparative study of stepping angiography and traditional segmental angiography in lower limb anterograde venography.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an acute kidney injury manifests within 72 h post-administration of contrast media, excluding other kidney-damage etiologies. Despite the recognition of CIN, the complex interplay among high-risk factors remains poorly understood, and precision in the existing risk stratification models is lacking. This retrospective, observational cohort study included patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) at four hospitals in Guangdong, China, between 2010 and 2018. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients of prognostic interest were collected. The main outcome was CIN occurrence. In total 12,376 patients were included in the final data analysis. Contrast media dosage was positively associated with CIN risk, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.007 for each standard deviation increase in dosage. Doses above 140 ml significantly increased CIN risk (adjusted OR = 3.27). Notably, hypertensive and diabetic patients experienced greater risks at doses > 140 ml. Subgroup analyses underscored the importance of personalized dosage management. This study highlights the critical need for dosage management to mitigate CIN risk, particularly in high-risk patients. Individualized risk assessment and dose optimization strategies are essential to minimize the risk of CIN development and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.