ArticleScientific reports2025
Joint event extraction model based on dynamic attention matching and graph attention networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GTAT-GRN: a graph topology-aware attention method with multi-source feature fusion for gene regulatory network inference.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Event extraction is one of the important processes in event knowledge graph construction. However, extant event extraction models are confronted with the challenge of handling vague and unfamiliar event trigger words as well as noise that is prevalent in text. To address this issue, this study proposes a joint event extraction model that leverages dynamic attention matching and graph attention network. Specifically, the dynamic attention matching mechanism is employed to identify event nodes that contain text event structure features and to integrate event structure knowledge for constructing event pattern subgraph that correspond to the text, thereby resolving the problem of ambiguous and unknown trigger word classification. To better discriminate between semantic information and event structure information and to mitigate the impact of noise in text, we introduce a graph attention network that integrates event structure features for aggregating feature embedding of node neighbors. Experiment results on the ACE2005 dataset demonstrate that our proposed model attains competitive performance in comparison to existing methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.