Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011549›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Joint event extraction model based on dynamic attention matching and graph attention networks.

Jiajun Cheng, Wenjie Liu, Zhifan Wang, Zhijie Ren, Xingwen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiajun ChengSchool of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Wenjie LiuSchool of Software, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China. wenjiel@163.com.
Zhifan WangSchool of Software, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China.
Zhijie RenSchool of Software, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China.
Xingwen LiSchool of Software, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China.

Funding

Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology 2021ZD0302901National Natural Science Foundation of China 62071240Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20220804, BK20231142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Event extraction is one of the important processes in event knowledge graph construction. However, extant event extraction models are confronted with the challenge of handling vague and unfamiliar event trigger words as well as noise that is prevalent in text. To address this issue, this study proposes a joint event extraction model that leverages dynamic attention matching and graph attention network. Specifically, the dynamic attention matching mechanism is employed to identify event nodes that contain text event structure features and to integrate event structure knowledge for constructing event pattern subgraph that correspond to the text, thereby resolving the problem of ambiguous and unknown trigger word classification. To better discriminate between semantic information and event structure information and to mitigate the impact of noise in text, we introduce a graph attention network that integrates event structure features for aggregating feature embedding of node neighbors. Experiment results on the ACE2005 dataset demonstrate that our proposed model attains competitive performance in comparison to existing methods.

Identifiers

PMID40011549
PMCPMC11865488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.