Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011531›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Gilts are motivated to exit a stall.

Thomas Ede, Thomas D Parsons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas EdeDepartment of Clinical Studies, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, 505 Byrd Road, Kennett Square, PA, USA. tede@vet.upenn.edu.
Thomas D ParsonsDepartment of Clinical Studies, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, 505 Byrd Road, Kennett Square, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stalls (or crates) are still a common type of housing in the swine industry, despite public concern and regional legislation restricting their use. In this study, we examined the motivation of gilts to exit a stall. Sixteen stall-naïve gilts (Large White x Landrace) were locked for 60 min in a gestation crate that had been mounted with a novel apparatus allowing continuous monitoring (2 Hz measuring frequency) of the force applied to its back gate by the animal. Raw force measurements were low-pass filtered and discrete pushing events identified via local maxima. All gilts displayed some level of motivation to exit the crate, ranging from 41 to 173 in the number of pushing events, as well as exerting a maximum force applied from 124 to 645 N. A hierarchical cluster analysis applied to the median and interquartile range (IQR) of force generated during individual pushing events yielded two behavioural profiles. One group of eight animals was more active than the other. This group exhibited a greater number of pushes, recorded a higher maximum, median force and its IQR, as well as a shorter time interval between two pushes (all t-tests with a P < 0.05). While all these naïve animals worked to leave the stall, gilts displayed different motivation profiles in trying to exit the stall consistent with a reactive/proactive framework. Taken together these findings provide further evidence to support stall confinement as aversive to swine but highlight the complexities in understanding and improving pig welfare.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalHousing, AnimalMotivationAnimalsAnimal WelfareFemaleSwine

Identifiers

PMID40011531
PMCPMC11865514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.