Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011528›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Parallel Datasets for Classification of Respiratory Rhythm Phases.

Julian Szymański, Maciej Szefler, Kacper Karski, Filip Krawczak, Damian Jankowski

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julian Szymański *Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Narutowicza 11/13, Gdańsk, 80-233, Poland. julian.szymanski@pg.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5029-6768
Maciej Szefler *Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Narutowicza 11/13, Gdańsk, 80-233, Poland.
Kacper Karski *Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Narutowicza 11/13, Gdańsk, 80-233, Poland.
Filip Krawczak *Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Narutowicza 11/13, Gdańsk, 80-233, Poland.
Damian Jankowski *Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Narutowicza 11/13, Gdańsk, 80-233, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper describes the dataset used for building machine learning models for labeling respiratory rate signals into four classes: breath-in, breath-out, and retentions after inhale and exhale. Additionally, we introduce a label to represent segments of the signal infected by noise. The data was collected simultaneously using different types of sensors: a tensometer and two accelerometers. The datasets have been made publicly available via the Gdansk University of Technology repository "Most Wiedzy", ensuring open access to the data and reproducibility of research on respiratory classification. Along with the data we also publish the source files of tools used for building the datasets as well as our implementation of the models for respiratory rate classification and visualization. The data have been stored in CSV format and organized through a directory structure according to different breath patterns. These datasets can be easily processed and converted for usage with different machine learning methods across various research applications in respiratory health.

Indexed as

RespirationRespiratory RateHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40011528
PMCPMC11865572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.