Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011512›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effects of startle on cognitive performance and physiological activity revealed by fNIRS and thermal imaging.

Flora Schwartz, Jonathan Deniel, Mickaël Causse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Flora SchwartzInstitut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace - Supaero, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France. Flora.schwartz.pro@gmail.com.
Jonathan DenielInstitut National Universitaire Champollion, Albi, France.
Mickaël CausseInstitut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace - Supaero, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-19-ASMA-0009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden and threatening stimuli can trigger a startle reflex, a stereotyped physiological response that may lead to a brief cognitive incapacitation. Better understanding this reaction would be beneficial to safety-critical occupational domains. We characterized some physiological correlates of the startle response while participants completed a difficult task (Toulouse N-back task) tapping executive functions. During the task, loud and threatening sounds were presented unpredictably to trigger a startle reflex. Brain activity and facial skin temperature were measured in 34 participants using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and functional infrared thermal imaging (fITI), respectively. In the high difficulty condition, participants were generally less efficient, but their performance improved slightly following startle in the high difficulty condition. Brain activity in the right prefrontal cortex was also higher following startle, potentially reflecting a compensatory overactivation to sustain performance. Interestingly, higher trait-anxiety was associated with lower task performance, still following startle in the high difficulty condition. Finally, we found a decrease in temperature of the right eye and right cheek as well as an increase in the nose temperature following startle. These results underscore the complexity of startle-induced cognitive and physiological dynamics, which may have implications for occupational settings where managing sudden stressors is crucial.

Indexed as

CognitionReflex, StartleAdultBrainExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMalePrefrontal CortexSkin TemperatureSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung AdultAuditory startleExecutive control networkFacial temperaturefITIfNIRSMental workload

Identifiers

PMID40011512
PMCPMC11865621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.