ArticleScientific reports2025
Modelling of pome fruit pollen performance using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agriculture, particularly fruit production, is considered a crucial industry with a significant economic impact in many countries. Extreme fluctuations in air temperature can negatively affect the flowering periods of fruit species. Therefore, it is important to conduct studies on pollen performance analysis to determine these effects. Pollen performance analysis has seen significant advancements in agricultural research, with the emergence of new pollen germination methods driven by advances in technology and equipment. In these analyses, in addition to traditional approaches, Artificial Neural Networks and deep learning have gained importance recently. The main objective of this study is to develop a model that predicts the germination rate based on a given set of input variables. Firstly, pollen germination rate and pollen tube length were determined in vitro. Pollen grains from four cultivars of pome fruit were sown in three different media and incubated for four different durations at seven different temperatures for an in vitro test. Three deep-learning models with two hidden layers were developed and different optimizers were considered for model development. The best model was selected through a validation test.This study aimed to develop a machine learning model for predicting pollen germination rates in pome fruits. Pollen grains from four cultivars were subjected to in vitro germination tests under varying temperatures, media, and durations. Using artificial neural networks, the model achieved an R² value of 0.89 with the Adam optimizer, demonstrating high accuracy in predicting germination rates. These findings highlight the potential of machine learning in advancing agricultural research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.