ArticleScientific reports2025
Molecular mechanism of type ib MET inhibitors and their potential for CNS tumors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medicinal Chemistry of Small-Molecule c-Met Inhibitors: From Approved Therapies to Emerging Multitarget Anticancer Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Research progress on resistance and mechanisms of c-Met inhibitors in treatingJournal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Drug Interactions of Vebreltinib, a Novel Type I c-Met Inhibitor, Coadministration With Rifampin or Itraconazole in Healthy Participants.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Targeting MET in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: from molecular mechanism to precision therapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Targeted Therapies Modulating Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition-Linked Oncogenic Signaling in the Tumor Microenvironment: Comparative Profiling of Capmatinib, Bemcentinib, and Galunisertib.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The pharmacokinetics of capmatinib and its efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer treatment: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The emergence of targeted therapies for MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations has significantly changed the treatment landscape for NSCLC and other solid tumors. The skipping of METex14 results in activating the MET-HGF pathway and promoting tumor cell proliferation, migration, and preventing apoptosis. Type Ib MET inhibitors, designed to selectively target the "DFG-in" conformation of MET, characteristically bind to the ATP-binding pocket of MET in a U-shaped conformation, extending into the solvent-accessible region and interact strongly with residue Y1230 through π-π interactions, have shown remarkable efficacy in treating METex14-altered NSCLC, including cases with brain metastases (BMs). Notably, vebreltinib and capmatinib have demonstrated superior blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability in both computational and experimental models, highlighting their potential for treating the central nervous system (CNS) metastases. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is highly expressed in the BBB, which limits the brain uptake of many highly lipophilic drugs. Despite challenges posed by P-gp mediated efflux, vebreltinib has emerged as a promising candidate for CNS treatment due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and minimal susceptibility to P-gp efflux. This study underscores the importance of molecular dynamics simulations in predicting drug efficacy and BBB penetration, providing valuable insights for the development of CNS-targeted metastases therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.