Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011470›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

Clinical prediction model for transition to psychosis in individuals meeting At Risk Mental State criteria.

Laura J Bonnett, Alexandra Hunt, Allan Flores, Catrin Tudur Smith, Filippo Varese, Rory Byrne, Heather Law, Marko Milicevic, Rebekah Carney, Sophie Parker and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laura J BonnettDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. l.j.bonnett@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6981-9212
Alexandra HuntDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Allan FloresDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Catrin Tudur SmithDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Filippo VareseSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Rory ByrneSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Heather LawSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Marko MilicevicInstitute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Rebekah CarneySchool of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2859-6825
Sophie ParkerSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Alison R YungSchool of Health Sciences, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0401-9791
IPPACT Study Group which also includes

Funding

DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) 17/31/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe At Risk Mental State (ARMS) (also known as the Ultra or Clinical High Risk) criteria identify individuals at high risk for psychotic disorder. However, there is a need to improve prediction as only about 18% of individuals meeting these criteria develop a psychosis with 12-months. We have developed and internally validated a prediction model using characteristics that could be used in routine practice.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis, followed by focus groups with clinicians and service users to ensure that identified factors were suitable for routine practice. The model was developed using logistic regression with backwards selection and an individual participant dataset. Model performance was evaluated via discrimination and calibration. Bootstrap resampling was used for internal validation.

resultsWe received data from 26 studies contributing 3739 individuals; 2909 from 20 of these studies, of whom 359 developed psychosis, were available for model building. Age, functioning, disorders of thought content, perceptual abnormalities, disorganised speech, antipsychotic medication, cognitive behavioural therapy, depression and negative symptoms were associated with transition to psychosis. The final prediction model included disorders of thought content, disorganised speech and functioning. Discrimination of 0.68 (0.5-1 scale; 1=perfect discrimination) and calibration of 0.91 (0-1 scale; 1=perfect calibration) showed the model had fairly good predictive ability. DISCUSSION: The statistically robust prediction model, built using the largest dataset in the field to date, could be used to guide frequency of monitoring and enable rational use of health resources following assessment of external validity and clinical utility.

Identifiers

PMID40011470
PMCPMC11865318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.