ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2025
Toolkit for integrating millimeter-sized microfluidic biomedical devices with multiple membranes and electrodes.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of a portable multiplex detection system for four bee viral paralysis diseases based on RT-PCR-microfluidic chip integrated technology.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Transformative biomedical devices to overcome biomatrix effects.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, microfluidic systems have evolved to incorporate increasingly complex multi-layer and multi-material structures. While conventional 2-dimensional microfluidic systems are typically fabricated with lithographic techniques, the increase in system complexity necessitates a more versatile set of fabrication techniques. Similarly, although 3D printing can easily produce intricate microfluidic geometries, integrating multiple membranes and electrode components remains challenging. This study proposes a toolkit for fabricating free-standing 3-dimensional microfluidic systems for biomedical devices, incorporating flow channels, electrodes, and membranes. The fabrication techniques include molding separation using 3D printed molds, laser-based processing, and component assembly, each achieving micron resolution. Here, we introduce a novel approach to integrate membranes into microfluidics by directly curing elastomer-based microfluidics with the membrane through replica molding, while preserving membrane functionality by effectively removing elastomer residues through reactive ion etching. The resulting membrane-elastomer microfluidic component significantly simplifies the assembly of intricate microfluidic systems, reducing the device size to millimeter dimensions, suitable for implantable applications. The toolkit's versatility is demonstrated by a redox flow iontophoretic drug delivery prototype at the millimeter scale, featuring two electrodes, four membranes, and four microfluidic channels.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.