ArticleScientific data2025
CoronaryDominance: Angiogram dataset for coronary dominance classification.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Non-Invasive and Invasive Diagnostic Methods for Coronary Artery Disease: Single-Centre Data.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Real-Time Coronary Artery Dominance Classification from Angiographic Images Using Advanced Deep Video Architectures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We release a new dataset containing invasive coronary angiograms for the coronary dominance classification task, an essential aspect of SYNTAX score estimation for assessing the severity of coronary artery disease. The dataset contains 1,574 angiographic studies, a set of X-ray multi-view videos classified as right or left dominant. The dataset has three parts: main, real distribution, and domain shift. Each study in the main dataset falls into five categories: normal, poor quality, artifact, high uncertainty, or right coronary artery (RCA) occlusion. These tags help classify the dominance more accurately and allow for uncertainty estimation and outlier detection. In the real distribution part, there are 400 randomly selected studies. In contrast the domain shift part includes studies from an interventional angiography system that differs from that used in the main and real distribution parts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.