Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011424›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Molecular assessment of Chlamydia psittaci and Circovirus in psittacines from a CETAS in Bahia, Brazil.

Edma Santos Antonio, Ricardo Evangelista Fraga, Priscila Sacramento, Ayane Lima de Freitas, Ana Clara Barbosa Santana, Sabrina Barbosa, Ramon Costa Dominato, Janisete Gomes Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edma Santos AntonioDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Ilhéus, BA, 45662-900, Brazil. edmabiologa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-8472
Ricardo Evangelista FragaInstituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Campus Anísio Teixeira, Vitória da Conquista, Salvador, BA, 45029-094, Brazil.
Priscila SacramentoUniversidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Campus Jequié, Jequié, BA, 45205-490, Brazil.
Ayane Lima de FreitasInstituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Campus Anísio Teixeira, Vitória da Conquista, Salvador, BA, 45029-094, Brazil.
Ana Clara Barbosa SantanaInstituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Campus Anísio Teixeira, Vitória da Conquista, Salvador, BA, 45029-094, Brazil.
Sabrina BarbosaInstituto Multidisciplinar em Saúde, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Campus Anísio Teixeira, Vitória da Conquista, Salvador, BA, 45029-094, Brazil.
Ramon Costa DominatoDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Ilhéus, BA, 45662-900, Brazil.
Janisete Gomes SilvaDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Campus Soane Nazaré de Andrade, Ilhéus, BA, 45662-900, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 316735/2021-3Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.684972/2022-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mistreatment and unsanitary conditions to which trafficked animals are subjected provide an environment conducive to the proliferation and dissemination of pathogens. The Centros de Triagem de Animais Silvestres (CETAS - Wild Animal Screening Centers), which receive trafficked animals, aim to release them back into the wild, thus making the investigation of pathogens essential. The objective of this study was to conduct an epidemiological study of infections by Chlamydia psittaci and Circovirus in psittacines from wildlife trafficking housed at a CETAS in Bahia. Cloacal swab and blood samples were collected from 135 psittacines, both residents and newly arrived in quarantine, housed at the CETAS in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia. The presence of pathogens was determined by conventional PCR. The PCRs consisted of amplifying the opmA gene and ORF1 to detect C. psittaci and Circovirus, respectively. For C. psittaci, three (2.2%) animals were diagnosed as positive, then treated with antibiotics, retested, and included in the CETAS population after testing negative for the bacterium. Among the 135 psittacines evaluated, 22 (16%) showed feathering abnormalities despite testing negative for Circovirus. This research was the first epidemiological survey of Circovirus infection in psittacines in Bahia and improved the sanitary safety of wildlife release programs.

Indexed as

Bird DiseasesChlamydophila psittaciCircoviridae InfectionsCircovirusPsittaciformesPsittacosisAnimalsAnimals, WildBrazilBehaviorBFDVChlamydiosisConservationQuarantineRelease

Identifiers

PMID40011424
PMCPMC12095694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.